「英中对照」技能组合正在变化:最新一期楼宇自控行业Monday Live讨论探讨AI对智慧建筑从业者意味着什么
The Skill Set Is Changing: What AI Means for the People Behind Smarter Buildings
汇聚资深楼宇自控专业人士的每周行业讨论Monday Live最新一期,围绕十月“技能组合演变”主题探讨AI对智慧建筑从业者的影响。讨论跳出AI是否会替代岗位的常见问题,提出实践经验、系统思维、适配能力及使用新工具时保有判断力的能力组合价值更为突出。讨论提出AI已应用于建筑设计、估算、项目管理、调优、监控、维护、诊断、调试等全生命周期环节,核心定位为从业者辅助工具而非替代方案。
该资料汇集楼宇自控业内关于AI时代人才能力要求的讨论观点,可为企业人才培养、AI工具部署提供参考;文中相关价值判断均为与会者观点,实际应用成效需结合具体场景核验。
Building automation has always been a field where experience matters. You learn what a bad actuator sounds like. You know when a sensor reading does not make sense. You recognize the difference between a controls problem, a mechanical problem, and a specification problem.楼宇自动化一直是一个看重经验的领域。你能听出执行器出问题时的声音,能判断传感器读数何时不合理,也能辨识控制问题、机械问题和规格问题之间的区别。
That knowledge is not going away, but the way people access it, apply it, and build on it is changing quickly.这些知识不会消失,但人们获取、运用和积累知识的方式正在迅速改变。
That was the focus of the latest Monday Live discussion, part of its October theme on evolving skill sets. Monday Live is a weekly industry discussion that brings together experienced building automation professionals to explore the technologies, trends, and ideas shaping the future of smarter buildings.这正是最新一期 Monday Live 讨论的焦点,属于其十月主题“不断演进的技能组合”的一部分。Monday Live 是每周一次的行业讨论,汇聚经验丰富的楼宇自动化专业人士,探讨塑造智慧建筑未来的技术、趋势和理念。
The conversation moved beyond the familiar question of whether AI will replace jobs. A more useful question emerged instead: what becomes more valuable when AI can help people learn, troubleshoot, design, document, and analyze faster than before?讨论超越了人们熟悉的“人工智能是否会取代工作岗位”这一问题。一个更有意义的问题随之浮现:当人工智能能够帮助人们比以往更快地学习、排查故障、设计、编制文档和分析时,什么会变得更有价值?
The answer appears to be a combination of practical experience, systems thinking, adaptability, and the ability to use new tools without surrendering judgment.答案似乎是实践经验、系统思维、适应能力,以及在使用新工具时不放弃独立判断的能力这几者的结合。
The Technician Is Becoming More Capable技术人员的能力正变得更强
One of the strongest observations from the discussion was surprisingly simple. When technicians need help in the field, one of their most useful tools may already be YouTube.讨论中最有力的观察之一意外地简单。当技术人员在现场需要帮助时,他们最有用的工具之一可能已经是 YouTube。
Instead of reading a long manual from beginning to end, a technician can search for a specific controller, panel, fault code, or procedure and often find someone showing exactly how to diagnose it. The learning happens at the moment it is needed.技术人员不必从头到尾阅读冗长的手册,而是可以搜索特定的控制器、控制柜、故障代码或操作流程,而且往往能找到有人准确演示如何诊断问题。学习就发生在需要它的那一刻。
AI pushes that model further. A technician can increasingly ask a direct question, show a device through a camera, describe a problem, or provide a model number and receive targeted guidance almost immediately.人工智能进一步推动了这种模式。技术人员越来越可以直接提问、通过摄像头展示设备、描述问题或提供型号,并几乎立即获得有针对性的指导。
That changes the value of knowledge. It no longer matters only what someone has memorized. It also matters how effectively they can find, question, verify, and apply the information they need.这改变了知识的价值。重要的不再仅仅是一个人记住了什么,还包括他们能多有效地查找、质疑、核实并运用所需信息。
This does not make experience less important. If anything, it can make experienced people more productive. The industry has spent years talking about a shortage of skilled field personnel, and one path forward may be less about replacing those people and more about giving them better tools.这并不会降低经验的重要性。如果说有什么影响,它反而能让经验丰富的人更有成效。行业多年来一直在谈论熟练现场人员短缺的问题,而未来的出路之一或许不在于取代这些人员,而在于为他们提供更好的工具。
Just-in-Time Learning Is Becoming Part of the Job即时学习正在成为工作的一部分
Traditional technical education is usually built from fundamentals upward. Learn the theory, learn the system, learn the procedures, then apply them.传统技术教育通常采用从基础向上构建的方式。先学习理论、系统和流程,然后再加以应用。
The emerging model often works in the opposite direction. A problem appears first, then the worker learns exactly what is needed to solve it.新兴模式往往以相反的方式运作。先出现问题,然后工作人员精准学习解决问题所需的内容。
That can be incredibly efficient, but it also creates a legitimate concern. If people become very good at following instructions without understanding the underlying system, do we lose something important?这种模式效率极高,但也带来了合理的担忧。如果人们变得非常擅长遵照指令操作,却不理解底层系统,我们是否会失去某些重要的东西?
The Monday Live group raised exactly that issue. There is a real difference between knowing how to fix a specific problem and understanding why the system behaves the way it does.Monday Live 讨论小组恰恰提出了这个问题。知道如何修复某个具体问题,与理解系统为何会以这种方式运行,二者存在真正的区别。
That distinction matters in building automation because buildings rarely behave exactly as designed. Points are mislabeled. Sequences drift. Equipment is replaced. Drawings become outdated. Controls interact with mechanical systems in ways that are not obvious from a single screen.这种区别在楼宇自动化中很重要,因为建筑的实际运行很少与设计完全一致。点位标签错误、控制序列漂移、设备被更换、图纸过时。控制系统与机械系统之间的相互作用,仅凭单屏画面并不容易看出。
A person who only knows the procedure may fix the symptom. A person who understands the system has a better chance of finding the cause.只懂操作流程的人或许只能解决表面症状,理解系统的人则更有可能找到根本原因。
Systems Thinking May Matter More, Not Less系统思维或许会更加重要,而非不再重要
AI can retrieve information quickly. It can summarize documentation, suggest likely causes, organize project information, and help identify relationships that might otherwise take hours to uncover.AI 可以快速检索信息。它能够总结文档、推断可能原因、整理项目信息,并帮助识别原本可能需要数小时才能发现的关联。
But buildings are still systems.但建筑仍然是系统。
HVAC affects electrical load. Occupancy affects ventilation. Controls affect energy. Cybersecurity increasingly intersects with connected devices. Building data now touches enterprise systems, analytics, AI, and grid interaction.HVAC 会影响电力负荷,人员占用情况会影响通风,控制系统会影响能耗。网络安全与联网设备的交叉日益增多。建筑数据如今已涉及企业系统、分析、AI 和电网互动。
That means the people who understand how those pieces fit together may become more valuable, not less.这意味着,了解这些部分如何协同配合的人可能会变得更有价值,而不是更没有价值。
Another recurring theme in the discussion was that the future skill set is not limited to deeper expertise in controls. It is also broader. Building automation professionals increasingly need to understand how their work intersects with architecture, IT, cybersecurity, energy, data systems, commissioning, and operations.讨论中另一个反复出现的主题是,未来的技能组合并不局限于更深入的控制专业知识,其覆盖面也更广。楼宇自动化专业人员越来越需要理解自身工作如何与建筑设计、IT、网络安全、能源、数据系统、调适和运营相互交叉。
The technician of the future may still carry a screwdriver. They may also carry an AI assistant.未来的技术人员可能仍会随身携带螺丝刀,也可能会配备一位 AI 助手。
AI Is Moving Across the Building LifecycleAI 正贯穿建筑生命周期
Another important point was that AI should not be reduced to the idea of autonomous buildings.另一个重点是,不应将 AI 简化为自主建筑这一概念。
Its impact is already much broader.它的影响已经要广泛得多。
The group discussed AI being used across design, estimating, project management, tuning, monitoring, maintenance, diagnostics, and commissioning.专家组讨论了 AI 在设计、估算、项目管理、调优、监控、维护、诊断和调适各环节的应用。
That matters because some of the biggest gains may come from small improvements rather than dramatic autonomy.这一点很重要,因为一些最大的收益可能来自微小改进,而非大刀阔斧的自主化。
Commissioning is a good example. Traditional recommissioning can produce meaningful operational improvements, but it is expensive to repeat continuously. AI-supported tools can help monitor conditions more frequently, test expected responses, flag anomalies, and focus human attention where it is most valuable.调适就是一个很好的例子。传统的重新调适能够带来有意义的运营改善,但持续重复开展的成本很高。AI 辅助工具可帮助更频繁地监测状态、测试预期响应、标出异常,并将人的注意力集中到最有价值的地方。
The discussion described this as moving closer to continuous commissioning, something the industry has wanted for years but has often struggled to justify economically.讨论将此描述为更接近持续调适;这是行业多年来一直希望实现、却往往难以从经济上证明其合理性的做法。
The opportunity is not simply to automate people out of the process. It is to reduce the amount of time skilled people spend searching, documenting, checking, and repeating.机会不只是通过自动化让人员退出流程,而是减少熟练人员在搜索、记录、检查和重复工作上花费的时间。
The Transfer of Experience Is Changing经验传承正在发生变化
One of the industry’s most persistent problems is knowledge transfer.知识传承是行业最长期存在的问题之一。
A great deal of building automation expertise has historically been passed from experienced practitioners to younger technicians through years of field work. That transfer is slow, inconsistent, and vulnerable to retirement.从历史上看,大量楼宇自动化专业知识通过多年现场工作,由经验丰富的从业者传递给年轻技术人员。这种传承缓慢、不一致,而且容易因人员退休而中断。
Digital tools offer another possibility. A difficult procedure can be recorded once and replayed thousands of times. A troubleshooting method learned over 15 years can be documented. AI can help make large bodies of technical information searchable and accessible.数字工具提供了另一种可能。复杂的操作流程可以录制一次,然后回放数千次;历经 15 年掌握的故障排除方法可以被记录成文。AI 可以帮助让大量技术信息变得可搜索、可获取。
The Monday Live discussion described this as a new way of transferring craft knowledge, not just textbook knowledge.Monday Live 讨论将此描述为一种传承工艺知识的新方式,而不仅仅是课本知识。
That distinction matters because some of the most valuable expertise in our industry is not written in a specification. It is the small decision made by someone who has seen the same problem before and knows what to check first.这种区分很重要,因为我们行业中一些最有价值的专业知识并没有写在规范里。它是曾经遇到过相同问题、知道首先该检查什么的人所做出的细小决策。
Capturing more of that knowledge could become one of AI’s most useful roles.更多地捕获这类知识,可能会成为 AI 最有用的作用之一。
Education Has to Adapt Too教育也必须做出调整
The conversation eventually moved to schools, colleges, trade programs, and technical education.对话最终转到了学校、学院、职业培训项目和技术教育。
That may be where one of the biggest gaps exists.这可能正是最大缺口之一所在。
Technology is changing faster than most curricula can, while the need for technically capable people in the field remains high. The discussion suggested that community colleges, technical schools, and trade programs may be particularly important because they sit closest to the practical work the industry needs.技术的变化速度快于大多数学课程的更新速度,而该领域对具备技术能力人才的需求仍然很高。讨论认为,社区学院、技术学校和行业培训项目可能尤为重要,因为它们最贴近行业所需的实践工作。
The challenge is not simply adding an AI course.挑战并不只是简单增加一门人工智能课程。
It is teaching people how to work in an environment where the toolset itself changes continuously.而是教人们如何在工具集本身不断变化的环境中工作。
That means learning the fundamentals, understanding the system, and then being prepared to learn the next tool quickly.这意味着学习基础知识、理解系统,并做好快速掌握下一种工具的准备。
The Real Skill May Be Learning Faster真正的技能可能是更快学习
The closing observation may have been the most useful one.收尾时的观点可能是最有价值的一点。
The biggest change is speed.最大的变化是速度。
A person can now enter a meeting knowing very little about a subject and use search, video, documentation, and AI to develop a working understanding quickly.现在,一个人可以在对某一主题知之甚少的情况下参加会议,并利用搜索、视频、文档和人工智能快速形成可用于实际工作的理解。
That does not eliminate expertise. It changes how expertise grows.这并不会消除专业知识,而是改变专业知识的成长方式。
The strongest professionals may not be the ones who know everything before the problem arrives. They may be the ones who can recognize what they do not know, find the right information quickly, test it against experience, and apply it safely.最优秀的专业人员或许不是问题出现前就无所不知的人,而是能够认识到自己的不足、快速找到正确信息、结合经验加以检验并安全应用的人。
For building automation, that is a meaningful shift.对于楼宇自动化而言,这是一个意义重大的转变。
The industry has spent decades learning how to connect systems. The next challenge may be learning how to connect people, experience, and AI just as effectively.本行业花了数十年时间学习如何连接系统。下一个挑战可能是学习如何同样有效地连接人员、经验与人工智能。
Building automation has always been a field where experience matters. You learn what a bad actuator sounds like. You know when a sensor reading does not make sense. You recognize the difference between a controls problem, a mechanical problem, and a specification problem.楼宇自动化一直是一个重视经验的领域。你会了解执行器出故障时是什么声音;你能察觉传感器读数不合逻辑;你能分辨控制问题、机械问题和规格说明问题之间的区别。
That knowledge is not going away, but the way people access it, apply it, and build on it is changing quickly.这些知识不会消失,但人们获取、应用和拓展这些知识的方式正在迅速变化。
That was the focus of the latest Monday Live discussion, part of its October theme on evolving skill sets. Monday Live is a weekly industry discussion that brings together experienced building automation professionals to explore the technologies, trends, and ideas shaping the future of smarter buildings.这是最新一期 Monday Live 讨论的焦点,属于其十月“不断演进的技能组合”主题。Monday Live 是每周一次的行业讨论,汇集经验丰富的楼宇自动化专业人员,探讨塑造更智能建筑未来的技术、趋势和理念。
The conversation moved beyond the familiar question of whether AI will replace jobs. A more useful question emerged instead: what becomes more valuable when AI can help people learn, troubleshoot, design, document, and analyze faster than before?对话超越了人们熟悉的“人工智能是否会取代工作岗位”的问题。一个更有价值的问题浮现出来:当人工智能能够帮助人们比以往更快地学习、排查故障、设计、编写文档和分析时,什么会变得更有价值?
The answer appears to be a combination of practical experience, systems thinking, adaptability, and the ability to use new tools without surrendering judgment.答案似乎是实践经验、系统思维、适应能力,以及在使用新工具时不放弃判断力的能力,这几者的结合。
The Technician Is Becoming More Capable技术人员的能力正在不断增强
One of the strongest observations from the discussion was surprisingly simple. When technicians need help in the field, one of their most useful tools may already be YouTube.讨论中最有力的观点之一意外地简单。当技术人员在现场需要帮助时,他们最有用的工具之一可能已经是 YouTube。
Instead of reading a long manual from beginning to end, a technician can search for a specific controller, panel, fault code, or procedure and often find someone showing exactly how to diagnose it. The learning happens at the moment it is needed.技术人员不必从头至尾阅读冗长手册,而是可以搜索特定控制器、面板、故障代码或操作流程,并且往往能找到有人准确演示如何诊断该问题。学习发生在需要它的那一刻。
AI pushes that model further. A technician can increasingly ask a direct question, show a device through a camera, describe a problem, or provide a model number and receive targeted guidance almost immediately.人工智能进一步推进了这种模式。技术人员越来越可以直接提问、通过摄像头展示设备、描述问题或提供型号,并几乎立刻获得有针对性的指导。
That changes the value of knowledge. It no longer matters only what someone has memorized. It also matters how effectively they can find, question, verify, and apply the information they need.这改变了知识的价值。重要的不再仅仅是一个人记住了什么,还包括他能如何有效地查找、质疑、验证和应用所需信息。
This does not make experience less important. If anything, it can make experienced people more productive. The industry has spent years talking about a shortage of skilled field personnel, and one path forward may be less about replacing those people and more about giving them better tools.这并不会降低经验的重要性。若说有什么影响,它反而能让经验丰富的人员更高效。业内多年来一直在谈论熟练现场人员短缺的问题,而前进的一条道路可能不在于取代这些人,而在于为他们提供更好的工具。
Just-in-Time Learning Is Becoming Part of the Job即时学习正成为工作的一部分
Traditional technical education is usually built from fundamentals upward. Learn the theory, learn the system, learn the procedures, then apply them.传统技术教育通常从基础开始向上构建。先学习理论,学习系统,学习流程,然后再加以应用。
The emerging model often works in the opposite direction. A problem appears first, then the worker learns exactly what is needed to solve it.新兴模式往往以相反的方式运作。先出现问题,然后工作人员才去精确学习解决该问题所需的内容。
That can be incredibly efficient, but it also creates a legitimate concern. If people become very good at following instructions without understanding the underlying system, do we lose something important?这可能效率极高,但也带来了合理的担忧。如果人们变得非常善于遵循指令,却不理解底层系统,我们是否会失去某些重要的东西?
The Monday Live group raised exactly that issue. There is a real difference between knowing how to fix a specific problem and understanding why the system behaves the way it does.Monday Live 小组提出的正是这个问题。知道如何修复某个特定问题,与理解系统为何会以这种方式运行,二者之间存在真正的区别。
That distinction matters in building automation because buildings rarely behave exactly as designed. Points are mislabeled. Sequences drift. Equipment is replaced. Drawings become outdated. Controls interact with mechanical systems in ways that are not obvious from a single screen.在楼宇自动化中,这种区别很重要,因为楼宇的实际表现很少与设计完全一致。点位标签错误,控制序列漂移,设备被更换,图纸过时。控制系统与机械系统之间的交互方式,单凭一个屏幕并不容易看清。
A person who only knows the procedure may fix the symptom. A person who understands the system has a better chance of finding the cause.只知道流程的人可能只会修复表面症状。理解系统的人更有可能找到原因。
Systems Thinking May Matter More, Not Less系统思维可能更重要,而非更不重要
AI can retrieve information quickly. It can summarize documentation, suggest likely causes, organize project information, and help identify relationships that might otherwise take hours to uncover.AI 可以快速检索信息。它能够总结文档、提示可能原因、整理项目信息,并帮助识别原本可能需要数小时才能发现的关联。
But buildings are still systems.但楼宇仍然是系统。
HVAC affects electrical load. Occupancy affects ventilation. Controls affect energy. Cybersecurity increasingly intersects with connected devices. Building data now touches enterprise systems, analytics, AI, and grid interaction.HVAC 影响电力负荷,人员占用情况影响通风,控制系统影响能耗。网络安全与联网设备的交集日益增多。楼宇数据如今还涉及企业系统、分析、AI 和电网互动。
That means the people who understand how those pieces fit together may become more valuable, not less.这意味着,理解这些组成部分如何协同配合的人员可能会更有价值,而不是更没价值。
Another recurring theme in the discussion was that the future skill set is not limited to deeper expertise in controls. It is also broader. Building automation professionals increasingly need to understand how their work intersects with architecture, IT, cybersecurity, energy, data systems, commissioning, and operations.讨论中另一个反复出现的主题是,未来的技能组合并不局限于更深入的控制专业知识,还需要更广博。楼宇自动化专业人员越来越需要理解自身工作如何与建筑设计、IT、网络安全、能源、数据系统、调试和运营相互交叉。
The technician of the future may still carry a screwdriver. They may also carry an AI assistant.未来的技术人员可能仍会携带螺丝刀,也可能携带着 AI 助手。
AI Is Moving Across the Building LifecycleAI 正在贯穿楼宇生命周期
Another important point was that AI should not be reduced to the idea of autonomous buildings.另一个重点是,不应将 AI 简单归结为自主楼宇这一概念。
Its impact is already much broader.它的影响已经要广泛得多。
The group discussed AI being used across design, estimating, project management, tuning, monitoring, maintenance, diagnostics, and commissioning.小组讨论了 AI 在设计、估算、项目管理、调优、监测、维护、诊断和调试等环节中的应用。
That matters because some of the biggest gains may come from small improvements rather than dramatic autonomy.这一点很重要,因为一些最大的收益可能来自微小改进,而非戏剧性的自主化。
Commissioning is a good example. Traditional recommissioning can produce meaningful operational improvements, but it is expensive to repeat continuously. AI-supported tools can help monitor conditions more frequently, test expected responses, flag anomalies, and focus human attention where it is most valuable.调试就是一个很好的例子。传统的重新调试能够带来有意义的运行改进,但持续重复开展的成本很高。AI 支持的工具可以帮助更频繁地监测状况、测试预期响应、标记异常,并将人工注意力集中在最有价值的地方。
The discussion described this as moving closer to continuous commissioning, something the industry has wanted for years but has often struggled to justify economically.讨论将此描述为更接近持续调试;这是业内多年来一直希望实现,却往往难以从经济层面证明其合理性的事情。
The opportunity is not simply to automate people out of the process. It is to reduce the amount of time skilled people spend searching, documenting, checking, and repeating.机会不只是通过自动化将人排除在流程之外,而是减少技术人员在搜索、记录、检查和重复工作上花费的时间。
The Transfer of Experience Is Changing经验传承正在改变
One of the industry’s most persistent problems is knowledge transfer.行业最持久的问题之一是知识传承。
A great deal of building automation expertise has historically been passed from experienced practitioners to younger technicians through years of field work. That transfer is slow, inconsistent, and vulnerable to retirement.历史上,大量楼宇自动化专业知识都是通过多年现场工作,由经验丰富的从业者传授给年轻技术人员的。这种传承方式缓慢、不稳定,且容易因退休而中断。
Digital tools offer another possibility. A difficult procedure can be recorded once and replayed thousands of times. A troubleshooting method learned over 15 years can be documented. AI can help make large bodies of technical information searchable and accessible.数字工具提供了另一种可能。一个复杂的流程可以录制一次,回放数千次。积累了15年的故障排除方法可以被记录下来。人工智能可以帮助使大量技术信息变得可搜索、可获取。
The Monday Live discussion described this as a new way of transferring craft knowledge, not just textbook knowledge.周一直播讨论将此描述为一种传承工艺知识的新方式,而不仅仅是课本知识。
That distinction matters because some of the most valuable expertise in our industry is not written in a specification. It is the small decision made by someone who has seen the same problem before and knows what to check first.这种区别很重要,因为我们行业中一些最有价值的专业知识并没有写在规范说明书中。它是以前遇到过同样问题、知道该先检查什么的人所做出的微小判断。
Capturing more of that knowledge could become one of AI’s most useful roles.捕捉更多此类知识可能成为人工智能最有用的角色之一。
Education Has to Adapt Too教育也必须适应
The conversation eventually moved to schools, colleges, trade programs, and technical education.讨论最终转向了学校、学院、职业课程和技术教育。
That may be where one of the biggest gaps exists.这可能是最大的差距所在之一。
Technology is changing faster than most curricula can, while the need for technically capable people in the field remains high. The discussion suggested that community colleges, technical schools, and trade programs may be particularly important because they sit closest to the practical work the industry needs.技术变化的速度超过了大多数课程的更新速度,而该领域对技术能力人才的需求依然很高。讨论认为,社区学院、技术学校和职业课程可能尤为重要,因为它们最贴近行业所需的实际工作。
The challenge is not simply adding an AI course.挑战不只是增加一门人工智能课程。
It is teaching people how to work in an environment where the toolset itself changes continuously.而是教会人们如何在工具集本身不断变化的环境中工作。
That means learning the fundamentals, understanding the system, and then being prepared to learn the next tool quickly.这意味着学习基础知识、理解系统,然后做好快速学习下一个工具的准备。
The Real Skill May Be Learning Faster真正的技能可能是更快地学习
The closing observation may have been the most useful one.收尾的观点可能是最有用的一个。
The biggest change is speed.最大的变化是速度。
A person can now enter a meeting knowing very little about a subject and use search, video, documentation, and AI to develop a working understanding quickly.现在,一个人可以在对某个主题知之甚少的情况下参加会议,并利用搜索、视频、文档和人工智能快速形成实用的理解。
That does not eliminate expertise. It changes how expertise grows.这并不会消除专业知识,而是改变专业知识的成长方式。
The strongest professionals may not be the ones who know everything before the problem arrives. They may be the ones who can recognize what they do not know, find the right information quickly, test it against experience, and apply it safely.最优秀的专业人员可能不是那些在问题出现前就无所不知的人,而是那些能够认识到自己的不足、快速找到正确信息、用经验加以检验并安全应用的人。
For building automation, that is a meaningful shift.对于楼宇自动化而言,这是一个意义重大的转变。
The industry has spent decades learning how to connect systems. The next challenge may be learning how to connect people, experience, and AI just as effectively.行业已经花了数十年时间学习如何连接系统。下一个挑战可能是学习如何同样有效地将人、经验和人工智能连接起来。
The post The Skill Set Is Changing: What AI Means for the People Behind Smarter Buildings appeared first on AutomatedBuildings.com.文章技能组合正在改变:人工智能对智慧建筑背后人员意味着什么首次发表于AutomatedBuildings.com。
来源:AutomatedBuildings · automatedbuildings.com